Zprávy památkové péče 2020, 80(1):33-45 | DOI: 10.56112/zpp.2020.1.06

Werkbund colony exhibition as a subject of heritage protection

Eliška Podholová Varyšová

During interwar Europe, the exhibitions of the Deutscher Werkbund also addressed the housing crisis and the issue of housing reform for modern man. In several European cities, the local Werkbund presented exemplary housing estates of modern living as a manifesto of modern architecture and a contemporary view of architectural aesthetics, the structure of a residential house, and the use of new technologies and materials. The first exhibition of its kind was the Weissenhof housing estate in Stuttgart, organized in 1927 by the Deutscher Werkbund. After the exhibition, the houses became part of the city's housing fund, and the presentation of real permanent houses instead of exhibition exhibits inspired a similar exhibition in Brno in 1928 (Svaz čs. Díla), Wroclaw/Breslau 1929 (Deutscher Werkbund), Zurich 1931 (Schweizerischer Werkbund), Vienna 1932 (Österreichischer Werkbund), and Prague 1932 (Svaz čs. Díla). After the exhibitions, the houses were rented or sold, and the real experiment of living in modern architecture began. The first building modifications and changes in the residents did not take long to arrive. The relationship between the modern-minded population and the houses was soon affected by the political situation, and the first wave of emigration began in the 1930s. The original residents were often replaced by people with a more traditional mindset and taste, which became reflected in the appearance of the colonies. During the war, the colonies in Stuttgart and Vienna were hit by bombing, and the destroyed houses were replaced by new buildings after the war. In some places, the houses served the army or as accommodation for German officers or emergency housing.
The first art-historical and heritage interest in the exhibition settlement began to appear slowly in the 1950s, but real heritage protection usually did not arrive until the 1970s. An exception is the Stuttgart Weissenhof, which has been protected as a heritage property since 1958. Along with heritage protection, a general renovation of the housing estates in Stuttgart, Vienna and Zurich began in the 1980s, where the houses are in the ownership of a single owner (state, city, or building cooperative). These pioneering reconstructions were one of the first of their kind. They also provided proof of the difficulties of restoring interwar architecture - the issue of waterproofing flat roofs, insulation of the facades, window restoration, etc. At the same time, the questions arose of to what degree the original building materials should be preserved, and how to adapt residential buildings to current living standards.
In the 1990s, reconstructions also began with private owners in the colonies in Prague, Wroclaw, and Brno. Efforts to preserve at least a model house or apartment, already evident during the renovations in the 1980s, also began to expand. In 2006, a museum was opened at the Weissenhof in the Corbusier double house; it had undergone a second reconstruction which in many ways corrected the "transgressions" of the previous one.
In the 1990s, the reconstruction of the Scharoun hotel house in Wroclaw was started, and the reconstruction and rebuilding of Prague's Baba housing estate also began with better or worse results. In 2011, the City of Wroclaw launched a supportive financial program for heritage renovation of houses to correct private renovations and motivate owners. The major renovations of the 1980s also started ongoing maintenance in Zurich, and the second general renovation took place in Vienna in 2012-2016.
Information and experiences are being successfully shared through conferences and publications as well as due to such organizations like ICOMOS and DOCOMOMO; in recent years, efforts have also been made to better connect all six Werkbund colonies to the European Netzwerk der Werkbundsiedlungen network. This international inspiration is what is helping to resolve reconstructions and seek out the delicate balance between preserving the authenticity of interwar architecture and satisfying the demands for modern contemporary living.

Keywords: Werkbund exhibition colony, Werkbundsiedlung, Svaz čs. Díla, interwar architecture, heritage protection, reconstruction of 20th century architecture, Weissenhofsiedlung, Baba housing estate, WUWA, Nový dům, Neubühl, Werkbundsiedlung Wien, functionalism

Published: March 1, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Podholová Varyšová, E. (2020). Werkbund colony exhibition as a subject of heritage protection. Zprávy památkové péče80(1), 33-45. doi: 10.56112/zpp.2020.1.06
Download citation

References

  1. Lucius Burckhardt (ed.), Der Werkbund in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Form ohne Ornament, Stuttgart 1978.
  2. Astrid Gmeiner - Gottfried Pirhofer, Der Österreichische Werkbund. Alternative zur klassischen Moderne in Architektur, Raum- und Produktgestaltung, Salzburg, Wien 1985.
  3. Karin Kirsch, Die Weissenhofsiedlung. Werkbund-Ausstellung "Die Wohnung" Stuttgart 1927, Stuttgart 1987, 2. vydání 1999.
  4. Bau und Wohnung. Faksimiledruck der im Jahr 1927 erschienenen Originalausgabe mit einem Vorwort von Jürgen Joedicke, Stuttgart 1992, 2. vydání 2011.
  5. Zdeněk Rossmann - Bedřich Václavek (edd.), Výstava moderního bydlení Nový dům, katalog výstavy, Brno 1928.
  6. Jindřich Chatrný - Dagmar Černoušková - Pavel Borský (edd.), Nový dům Brno / New House Brno / 1928, Brno 2018.
  7. Jadwigy Urbanik WUWA 1929-2009. The Werkbund exhibition in Wrocław, Wrocław 2010.
  8. Jan Nesiba, Výstava "Byt a dílna" ve Vratislavi, Stavitel 10, 1929, č. 5-6, s. 96-115.
  9. Ueli Marbach - Arthur Rüegg, Werkbundsiedlung Neubühl in Zürich-Wollishofen 1928-32. Ihre Entstehung und Erneuerung, Zürich 1990.
  10. Andreas Nierhaus - Eva-Maria Orosz (edd.), Werkbundsiedlung Wien 1932. Ein Manifest des neuen Wohnens, Wien 2013.
  11. Pavel Janák (ed.), Výstava bydlení. Stavba osady Baba, Praha 1932.
  12. Tomáš Šenberger - Vladimír Šlapeta - Petr Urlich, Osada Baba. Plány a modely, Praha 2000.
  13. Hermann Nägele, Die Restaurierung der Weissenhofsiedlung 1981-1987, Stuttgart 1992.
  14. Jürgen Joedicke - Christian Plath, Die Weissenhofsiedlung, Stuttgart 1968.
  15. Wolfdieter Dreibholz, Die internationale Werkbundsiedlung Wien 1932, Bauforum 10, 1977, č. 61, s. 19-29.
  16. Lubomír Šlapeta - Vladimír Šlapeta, 50 Jahre WUWA, Bauwelt 70, 1979, č. 35, s. 1426-1445.
  17. Vladimír Šlapeta, Nový dům 1928 a Baba 1932, Umění a řemesla 24, 1979, č. 4, s. 19-26.
  18. Rostislav Švácha, Osada Baba, Umění 28, 1980.
  19. Jadwiga Urbanik, Dom dla osób samotnych i małżeństw bezdzietnych Hansa Scharouna, Wrocław 2014.
  20. Daniel Špička, Rekonstrukce vlastní vily Pavla Janáka, in: Architekt 45, 1999, č. 3, s. 8-14.
  21. Daniel Kurz - Nicola Losinger - Ulrike Sax, Spezialinventar. Wohnsiedlungen. Gemeinnütziger Wohnungsbau im kommunalen Inventar. 1999/2003, Zürich 1999, dostupné na: https://www.stadt-zuerich.ch/content/dam/stzh/hbd/Deutsch/Archaeologie_Denkmalpflege/Publikationen%20und%20Broschueren/Bestandesverzeichnisse/wohnsiedlungen_bestandesverzeichnis.pdf, vyhledáno 6. 4. 2020.
  22. Georg Adlberg (ed.), Baudenkmale der Moderne. Le Corbusier/Pierre Jeanneret. Doppelhaus in der Weissenhofsiedlung Stuttgart. Die Geschichte einer Instandsetzung, Stuttgart 2006.
  23. Jadwiga Urbanik (ed.), Der Weg zur Moderne. Werkbund-Siedlungen 1927-1932, Wrocław 2016.
  24. Jadwiga Urbanik (ed.), Cesta k modernitě. Sídliště Werkbundu 1927-1932, Wrocław 2016.
  25. Miloslava Perglová, Sutnar: kulturní památka, Architekt 47, 2001, č. 3, březen, s. 86-87.
  26. Ladislav Lábus, Vila Palička, Praha - Baba. Idealismus versus realita - o vnitřnostech a povrchu, Stavba 11, 2004, č. 4, s. 18-24.
  27. Eliška Varyšová, Osada Baba a její památková ochrana, Zprávy památkové péče 76, 2016, č. 6, s. 591-602.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.